In the last couple of weeks of your AP Art Course, your students have probably written and rewritten their Sustained Investigation statements more times than they can count. They’ve cropped, rearranged, and reconsidered their images a dozen different ways — and they’re so close to the work that sometimes they can’t see what’s obvious to everyone else.
That’s where a well-structured round of peer feedback can make all the difference.
A good peer review isn’t just about catching mistakes — it’s about celebrating each other’s growth, noticing what’s working, and pointing out small changes that can make a big impact before that final upload. For so many students, this is the moment when they feel truly proud to share their investigation with someone else, often for the first time as a near-final body of work.
I like to remind students that we can sometimes be a little blind to our own work, especially after working with the same images and writing for weeks or even months. Having someone else look at it with fresh eyes — someone who knows the rubric but also cares enough to read thoughtfully — can be the push they need to revise those last sticky spots in their written evidence or swap out that one image that doesn’t quite connect.
Make peer feedback meaningful.
I like to keep the feedback process intentional and structured. Each student completes a scoring sheet for their peer, so they’re not just giving vague praise or generic suggestions. They’re looking specifically at how the images connect to the inquiry, whether the writing clearly explains practice and revision, and how well the materials and ideas feel synthesized. It uses the same language as the AP rubrics so students continue to internalize them.
Here’s some sample feedback for an inquiry that explores how water can represent different emotions:
You can feel how thoughtful and supportive that is — it’s not just “Good job!” or “Add more detail,” it’s a real suggestion that helps the artist see their own work through someone else’s eyes.“Your writing mentions your question about how water can represent emotions, and I see some pieces that show crashing waves and calm ripples. But a few images don’t clearly connect back to your question in your writing. Try to explain how each piece shows an emotion — for example, how a stormy sea shows anger or how still water shows peace.”
Turn feedback into action.
But the real magic happens the next day. After peer scoring, we spend another class session reviewing all the feedback — both from peers and from me. Each student uses a simple Revision Planning Form to list out their biggest strengths and the specific changes they want to make to their portfolio.
This step is non-negotiable: it helps students move from “Okay, I got feedback” to “Here’s exactly what I’m going to fix — and why.” It also gives me a chance to check in, answer questions, and make sure they’re not spinning their wheels making changes that don’t help their main idea.
Here’s another example from a student who reviewed a peer’s Sustained Investigation about how visual symbology has changed over hundreds of years:
“Your portfolio shows how you explored ancient symbols and modern reinterpretations, but your writing doesn’t always explain how each piece connects to the bigger idea. Try adding a few sentences that describe how the materials you used (like stone texture or digital overlays) help show how symbols evolve but keep some original meaning. You're synthesizing materials, processes and ideas - make sure the AP readers know that! Tell them! Make it easy for them to see!”
When students translate this kind of note into an actionable to-do — like rewriting a paragraph or adding a quick side-by-side process image — their portfolios improve overnight.
One last push before the finish line.
By this point, most students feel exhausted but excited — they know they’re almost there. The peer review process is one last chance to tighten up weak spots, strengthen connections, and celebrate the hard work they’ve done. I love seeing how proud they are to share their portfolios with each other, and how invested they are in helping their classmates succeed too.
A good scoring guide, clear rubrics, and real examples of constructive feedback make this process less intimidating and a lot more rewarding — for students and teachers alike.
If you’re looking for an easy way to structure your own peer review and revision days, I put together the same lesson plans, scoring sheets, and revision forms I use in my classroom. They keep the feedback process clear and the revision process focused — and they’re available here.